A HostGator Review that Could Save a Potential Customer

When looking for shared hosting, it will be a good idea to find out as much as possible about the site. Experts will know a great deal about the pros and cons, but it can be just as important to get the views of everyday users. This Host gator review will give you answers to some of the many questions you may have had.

When reading a review, you need to consider what is important to you. One person’s idea of a good site will not be another’s, so don’t worry if it is marked down in areas that are of no interest to you. Also, check if the review is of the latest product as an older one may have many issues that have been ironed out in the latest one.

There had been a couple of issues discussed regarding Hostgator and users have spoken about them.

  • Speed – initial comments led to the understanding that this was not a fast service. Certain reports have given a load time of just 821ms. The new service provides sped of about 300ms – more than a couple of times faster than its predecessor.
  • Uptime – this has also seen a great improvement. At one time uptime was quoted at 99.85% but since the changes, has risen to a great 100%.

There is also free migration, so this is another box that can be ticked.

Name Recognition

Although you may not be aware of the reason why, you are bound to have heard of HostGator, and this is because it is one of the biggest web hosts available. An estimated 9 million domain names are covered and so it is safe to assume that they are doing well and keeping customers happy.

Why the Success?

Many have asked this and there is a myriad of answers. The uptime level is great and if there are problems, customer support has proved to be exceptional. Others say they are lucky as they have a large marketing budget and can reach a massive audience.

When the research results were in, this is what had been discovered.

Pros

  • Not only is this 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every day of the year, but there are several ways to contact the firm. You can reach them by phone, via email. or if you prefer it, live chat. When tested, this was partially confirmed.
  • Refund Guarantee. Rather than the standard 30-day money back guarantee offered by most in the industry, HostGator go a little further and extend this to 45.
  • Free Migration. If you do decide to change and become a customer of HostGator, they will arrange to transfer everything for you and this will be free of charge.
  • High level Security. Considering that the price is not too bad, there are data base backups daily, malware removal as standard, and for occasions when transactions are carried out, a free SSL certificate.
  • Help for Beginners. Many people are put off web hosts as they fear they will not be able to understand how they work. Many do seem to make it difficult for the newbie, but this is not the case here. Along with an extensive FAQ page, there are tutorials that can be accessed, and several documents that will hold the users hand as they allay every fear that may arise.

Cons

  • Uptime – this fell below the standard 99.9%
  • Added Costs. There are instant back-ups, but they are charged for.
  • Low prices come with a long sign up period and for a short time only.

This host gator review is not exhaustive, but does cover all the main points.

Where to Search for Top-notch Lenses – Lensespro.org Is your Best Pick

Even if you will never be able to take pictures to the level of a professional, it is still good to know that you are taking them to a good level.  Everyone will be in need of advice, as they will often take pictures under unusual conditions and maybe in places they are not familiar with. Once the camera has been purchased, there is the issue of the lenses. It will be easy to just want one of each type, but this is not practical for several reasons:

  • Price – Some lenses can be very expensive and if they are not used a lot will have been a waste of money.
  • Weight – Trying to carry around too many lenses will be difficult and could lead to missing the best pictures if the photographer is searching for the right one.
  • Use – There are just some circumstances that photographers will not find themselves in. if it is not an area you expect to photograph, don’t buy the lens.

To find the best lenses for your particular needs, there are websites who can tell you all you need to know about the lenses. While there are many out there, Lenses pro will cover all good lenses and make your job or hobby as a photographer that little bit easier and more enjoyable.

Lensespro.org

Help will be at hand at Lenses Pro for all photographers and it would be just as inaccurate for a professional to believe there is nothing they can learn as it would be for a newbie to think the site will not cover their needs. The company will advise on the best lenses for each scenario. If you have a DSLR camera, this is the site that you will find indispensable. The major problem when it comes to selecting the right lens is the amount that is available.

With fewer to choose from, it may be easy to make the decision alone; but, if you do this and get the wrong one, it can be both an expensive mistake, the loss of a great picture as a different lens would be better or in worse case scenarios both. If there is a camera shop where you live, there is the chance that you may get help there. But, the reality is that there are not many independent stores left and you don’t want to choose your camera because there is a shop nearby where you can get suitable lenses.

The Cost

As some lenses can cost over a thousand dollars, it is important that the right one is selected. It is understood that top quality lenses will be needed for professionals, but in the case of amateurs there may be the option to buy a cheaper version. Knowing what you will lose out on if you do can mean the difference between buying a cheaper one when the dearer one would be best, and vice-versa.

Customer Reviews

It is great that there is the option on Lenses Pro for users to leave their own reviews of the lenses they use. To get the opinion of someone who uses the lens regularly will be as beneficial as getting the views of an expert. It is also likely that they will write the review in a way that is easy to understand rather than the accurate but technical detail given by an expert.

Give Your View

Once you have used the site and got the advice that you wanted, you can give something back. By writing your own review on your latest lens, you can help the next generation of photographers select their own lenses and hopefully they will in turn review and help others.

What Kay Found

The interim findings of David Kay and the Iraq Survey Group make two things abundantly clear: Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was in material breach of its United Nations obligations before the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 last November, and Iraq went further into breach after the resolution was passed.

Kay’s interim findings offer detailed evidence of Hussein’s efforts to defy the international community to the last. The report describes a host of activities related to weapons of mass destruction that “should have been declared to the U.N.” It reaffirms that Iraq’s forbidden programs spanned more than two decades, involving thousands of people and billions of dollars.

What the world knew last November about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs was enough to justify the threat of serious consequences under Resolution 1441. What we now know as a result of David Kay’s efforts confirms that Hussein had every intention of continuing his work on banned weapons despite the U.N. inspectors, and that we and our coalition partners were right to eliminate the danger that his regime posed to the world.

Although Kay and his team have not yet discovered stocks of the weapons themselves, they will press on in the months ahead with their important and painstaking work. All indications are that they will uncover still more evidence of Hussein’s dangerous designs.

Before the war, our intelligence had detected a calculated campaign to prevent any meaningful inspections. We knew that Iraqi officials, members of the ruling Baath Party and scientists had hidden prohibited items in their homes.

Lo and behold, Kay and his team found strains of organisms concealed in a scientist’s home, and they report that one of the strains could be used to produce biological agents. Kay and his team also discovered documents and equipment in scientists’ homes that would have been useful for resuming uranium enrichment efforts.

Kay and his team have “discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002. The discovery . . . has come about both through the admissions of Iraqi scientists and officials concerning information they deliberately withheld and through physical evidence of equipment and activities that the Iraq Survey Group has discovered that should have been declared to the U.N.”

The Kay Report also addresses the issue of suspected mobile biological agent laboratories: “Investigation into the origin of and intended use for the two trailers found in northern Iraq in April has yielded a number of explanations, including hydrogen, missile propellant and BW [biological warfare] production, but technical limitations would prevent any of these processes from being ideally suited to these trailers. That said, nothing . . . rules out their potential use in BW production.” Here Kay’s findings are inconclusive. He is continuing to work this issue.

Kay and his team have, however, found this: “A clandestine network of laboratories and safe houses within the Iraqi Intelligence Service that contained equipment subject to U.N. monitoring and suitable for continuing CBW [chemical-biological weapons] research.” They also discovered: “a prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of BW agents, that Iraqi officials working to prepare for U.N. inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the U.N.”

The Kay Report confirms that our intelligence was correct to suspect the al-Kindi Co. of being involved in prohibited activity. Missile designers at al-Kindi told Kay and his team that Iraq had resumed work on converting SA-2 surface-to-air missiles into ballistic missiles with a range of about 250 kilometers, and that this work continued even while UNMOVIC inspectors were in Iraq. The U.N.-mandated limit for Iraq was a range of 150 kilometers.

The Kay Report also confirmed our prewar intelligence that indicated Iraq was developing missiles with ranges up to 1,000 kilometers. Similarly, Kay substantiated our reports that Iraq had tested an unmanned aerial vehicle to 500 kilometers, also in violation of U.N. resolutions.

What’s more, he and his team found that elaborate efforts to shield illicit programs from inspection persisted even after the collapse of Hussein’s regime. Key evidence was deliberately eliminated or dispersed during the postwar period. In a wide range of offices, laboratories and companies suspected of developing weapons of mass destruction, computer hard drives were destroyed, files were burned and equipment was carefully cleansed of all traces of use — and done so in a pattern that was clearly deliberate and selective, rather than random.

One year ago, when President Bush brought his concerns about Iraq to the United Nations, he made it plain that his principal concern in a post-Sept. 11 world was not just that a rogue regime such as Saddam Hussein’s had WMD programs, but that such horrific weapons could find their way out of Iraq into the arms of terrorists who would have even fewer compunctions about using them against innocent people across the globe.

In the interim report, Kay and his team record the chilling fact that they “found people, technical information and illicit procurement networks that if allowed to flow to other countries and regions could accelerate global proliferation.”

Having put an end to that harrowing possibility alone justifies our coalition’s action against Hussein’s regime. But that is not the only achievement of our brave men and women in uniform and their coalition partners.

Three weeks ago I paid my respects at a mass grave in the northern city of Halabja, where on a Friday morning in March 1988, Hussein’s forces murdered 5,000 men, women and children with chemical weapons. Saddam Hussein can cause no more Halabjas. His “Republic of Fear” no longer holds sway over the people of Iraq. For the first time in three decades, the Iraqi people have reason to hope for the future.

President Bush was right: This was an evil regime, lethal to its own people, in deepening material breach of its Security Council obligations, and a threat to international peace and security. Hussein would have stopped at nothing until something stopped him. It’s a good thing that we did.

The writer is Secretary of State.